Much chat on Twitter resonating from the recently posted People Management’s top 20 power tweeters & responses including David Goddin’s Troublist blog, which has got me thinking….
Hmm… curious one this…There’s a whole in/ out thing that happens with people-on-lists and Top Tweeters etc. Perception can be that being the In-crowd (included, involved, in vogue) is a good thing vs Out Crowd (outside, outcast, out-of-date) as not-so good.
Me? I celebrate the out, on the whole. You can be outspoken, outstanding, outrageous, outright & cause an outcry.
And yet I know it is more complex. I (and therefore fuchsiablue) have an odd relationship with the in & the out.
As a Practitioner, I seek to be edgy, curious, to stand slightly apart from clients and organisations. My role is, in part, to see things differently, offer new perspectives, agitate, provoke and question…. that’s part of why my clients work with me. When I’m there – walking the edge – I may not be liked, understood, accepted. I’m Out. I’m good with that. I kind of love it sometimes.
But then as a Person, I seek to be part of community, to belong, to be seen & heard well. I want to support, to encourage, to acknowledge the existing, to honour “what is” without constantly fighting the established. I want to build and nurture, not break and beat up. I’ll be honest, I like the notion of being “in” a crowd of folk I respect and enjoy. I’m a social animal, even with my anti-social tendencies.
I am both Person and Practioner. I seek to be both in and out. I’m contrary and co-operative…I understand there are consequences for both.
I’m interested now….how is it for you?